Downloading Movie and Tv is not a Crime

Question: Write an essay on "Downloading Movie and Tv is not a Crime". Answer: Presentation The given study portrays how people have an alternate perspective towards downloading a music or video from the web wrongfully. Also when theft is done it implies that duplicates of some records are made wrongfully without the consent of the copyright proprietor (Robertson et al., 2012). The exposition displayed talks about downloading motion picture and television taking into account the diverse speculations of morals when inferred to the examination. Diagram of ICT-Related Ethical Issue For this situation study two standards are utilized to comprehend the moral issues on downloading motion pictures and TV. Be that as it may, before it is clarified the hypotheses ought to be seen unmistakably (www.smh.com.au, 2016). An individual using the internet to download movies and TV must have ethics that bounds him to do it illegally. He might download the movie paying the copyright owner and this avoids him from any copyright infringement notice from the owner (Robertson et al., 2012). There are no laws made for an individual in Australia that criminalise a person of downloading or watching web content for personal use. Use of moral hypothesis to the examination Utilitarianism: The most acclaimed consequentialist hypothesis is utilitarianism. This hypothesis comes in various adaptations. A few adaptations keep up that the main thing that is characteristically great, or great in it, is delight, and the main thing that is naturally terrible is torment (Hayry, 2013). So to decide the ethical status of an activity, what one considers the aggregate amount of delight that the activity produces, and the aggregate amount of agony that it produces (Scarpi, 2012). The better the equalization of the previous over the last mentioned, the better the activity is, and the activity with the best adjust of joy over torment is the activity that one ought to perform. In the event that this perspective is correct, then different things that are important are just instrumentally profitable. So things like fellowship, information of different sorts, awesome centerpieces, as, are important simply because they offer ascent to joy, or to a decrease in torment. This form of utilitarianism was progressed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832). Bentham entered Oxford at 12 years old, and graduated at 15 years old, and after that went ahead to study law (Lucas Galinsky, 2015). As opposed to providing legal counsel, nonetheless, he chipped away at the undertakings of building up a superior legitimate framework, and of transforming both criminal and common law. His work had an extremely incredible effect upon legitimate hypothesis. In view of the theme downloading motion picture or television from web an individual ought to consider his moral values and judge himself that what might be the impact on the off chance that he downloads a substance that is copyright secured (Hayry, 2013). The individual ought not generally consider his benefit as opposed to put some fixation on the impact that would be brought on for their work done. Just-Consequentialism: Just consequentialism is an arrangement of connected morals created by James H. Field in 1999 by consolidating center qualities and consequentialism, and Bernard Gert's deontological ideas. In this hypothesis the individual occupied with doing some occupation doesn't consider the result of the work they do (Nye et al., 2015). The result is judged in the wake of doing the errand and on that premise the following move is made. Morals have minimal impact in Just Consequentialism the significant center of the individual is on finishing his undertaking. Unlawful Downloading "is" Stealing Generally an individual does not steal anything from the store but they try to steal things from the internet like a person would not think to steal a car but he can download movie from an illegal site. This is due to unawareness, which might lead an individual to do a crime. This is an unethical cause and the person trying to download movie from a illegal website might be sued copyright infringement notice. There are no laws made for an individual in Australia that criminalise a person of downloading or watching web content for personal use. Many gamers try to download games from torrent sites which is illegal and a breach to the copyright law. The companies expense a huge amount of money in making a game and if it gets pirated then there is a huge loss for the company. It is unethical for an individual to use pirated software or any media content and he might face jurisdiction (Aaltonen Salmi, 2013). When a media is copied against the permission of the copyright owner and distribu ted it is called piracy. There is no proper reason against copying a digital media because one might buy a video and copy it to his mobile and laptop and it also illegal but ethically this is right. The Australian Copyright Act. was passed in 1968 to cuddle the piracy of the web content. An individual breaking this law can be charged fine by the copyright owner, the fine is decided upon the web content that he has downloaded which is uncapped. The copyright owner can obtain the list of downloader from the local internet service provider who have illegally downloaded their content and can impose a fine upto $5000 (Gray, 2013). Solution to this problem is still in research and it has shown that the availability of media as online streaming option can reduce the infringement notice by 20%. The users must be discourage of piracy and more web media must be made available to the individual and other plans to curtail piracy is blocking of the illegal sites (Wang McClung, 2012). If the illegal pirate sites are blocked then the user would not be able to access those site and they would not face any problem regarding copyright (www.smh.com.au, 2016). Rationale Diagram: Figure 1: Diagram for mapping the arguments (Source: Created by author) Proposals There are numerous powerful answers for fathom downloading of motion pictures illicitly, for example, This issue can be unraveled by executing a few controls on the main source where the media is uploaded illegally. The medium through which the media is made available can be restricted by the copyright owner. The cost for which the substance ought to be accessible to the client ought to be such that the client would pay joyfully. More attention to dishearten the Australians for utilizing privateer locales and expansion their moral quality ought to be finished. The first substance ought to be made accessible to the web on their discharge this lessens the theft to an awesome level. The school and open wifi supplier ought to be capable to track the web utilization and for the encroachment notice. Conclusion: Downloading movie and Tv content from the internet is not considered as a crime unless it is done illegally. The illegal download of the movie from any pirate site can cause jurisdiction act on the user and copyright owner can impose an uncapped fine to the downloader. More web content that is free to the user should be increased in order to decrease the copyright infringement notice. Recording from a cable TV box is free to its subscriber and some free videos and movies must also be available to the user. There is a subscription charge for the cable TV but internet is not free users pay for their internet service also. However, the piracy of the paid content must be strictly prohibited as the artists and the singers make their CDs and DVDs that incurs them a cost and if it is copied and pirated over the internet then they face a huge loss and this has a negative impact on the world economy. References Aaltonen, M., Salmi, V. (2013). Versatile delinquents or specialized pirates? A comparison of correlates of illegal downloading and traditional juvenile crime.Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention,14(2), 188-195. Gray, J. (2013). The national capital in the landscape: the legacy of Australian government action from 1913 to 2013.Landscape Architecture Australia, (138), 20. Hayry, M. (2013).Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics. Routledge. Life, D., News, D., crime, D. (2014).Downloading movies and TV is not a crime.The Sydney Morning Herald. Lucas, B. J., Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Is utilitarianism risky? How the same antecedents and mechanism produce both utilitarian and risky choices.Perspectives on Psychological Science,10(4), 541-548. Robertson, K., McNeill, L., Green, J., Roberts, C. (2012). Illegal downloading, ethical concern, and illegal behavior.Journal of Business Ethics,108(2), 215-227. Scarpi, D. (2012). Work and fun on the internet: the effects of utilitarianism and hedonism online.Journal of Interactive Marketing,26(1), 53-67. Wang, X., McClung, S. R. (2012). The immorality of illegal downloading: The role of anticipated guilt and general emotions.Computers in Human Behavior,28(1), 153-159.